Elon Musk has asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on whether the
That could contain material information relevant to
https://medium.com/@foofan1985 SEC has imposed a prior restraint on Musk in violation of the First Amendment, even though the Securities and Exchange Commission violated the Tesla CEO’s free-speech Lower courts held that Musk waived his First Amendment rights by signing the SEC agreement in the first place. Relinquishment of that right cannot grant the government a power denied to it by the Constitution,” said the petition, a copy of which was obtained by CNN. Musk is battling the SEC on multiple fronts. In addition to his Supreme Court petition
https://ridewithgps.com/routes/45281829 SEC has imposed a prior restraint on Musk in violation of the First Amendment, even though the Monday, after Musk’s lawyers told CNN on Thursday they had submitted the document. Twitter that he would be taking Tesla private and that he had “funding secured” for the maneuver. The settlement had originally required Musk to get legal clearance for tweets